Thread:Auditorii/@comment-30029271-20190126220145/@comment-30029271-20190128204747

But for me the issue is simple and resolved, Dorvish Airways was a state-owned company. Controlled by the government which was the depositary and the de iure / de facto owner of 95% shares of the company (majority package) and the player who controlled the government (http://classic.particracy.net/viewparty.php?partyid=36305 - in a clear and undeniable way agreed to sell the company to a foreign company) Not only have I in this situation gained consent from a player who WAS (at that time) in control of the government and thus the control of the airline but also all was in compliance with the in-game mechanics... The government of Dorvik agreed to sell its shares (and the way the player agreed to that deal, I agree not sophisticated - "We agree" - but consent is a consent) and at the time of the deal Dorvik's right gave foreign investors right to invest in Dorvik with a possibility of not getting majority shares... but the government agreed to sell 95% of the company...

Couple of days ago You've (GRC) contacted me about the issue. I've presented You with exhausting evidence that the procedure was in compaliance with the Game Rules and the Game Mechanics... and what have You done.... went silent... So it was well within my rights to adjudge that everything was sorted out.

The isse here is clear. My personal mutual dislike with Auditori is the key behind all this DA crisis. Everytime I try to initiate some RP with Dorvik (even when he is not active in Dorvik) he tries to kill it with no obvious reason.

Excuse me but in this situation, with me presenting evidence clearing me from any suspicion of wrongdoing and showing that everything was done in a way it should be done (no powergaming), I have every right to think that the GRC's actions are biased... maybe due to the fact that Auditori is a member of the aforementioned.

I would like to hear how will be the "sorting out" by the GRC look like? What more do you need?